Author(s) also are required to provide names and contact information (mailing address, phone and fax numbers, and e-mail address) of at least three experts in the field as potential reviewers for the manuscript. . I was expecting it to be that fast to be honest (7 days of median, average from submission to editorial decision). Authors may suggest reviewers; these suggestions are often helpful, although they are not always followed. If doubt exists whether the research was conducted in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration or comparable standards, the authors must explain the reasons for their approach, and demonstrate that an independent ethics committee or institutional review board explicitly approved the doubtful aspects of the study. For research involving animals, their data or biological material, authors should supply detailed information on the ethical treatment of their animals in their submission. Read Editage Insights in your favorite RSS Reader. Special Issue Information. Depending on the ownership of the journal and its policies, you will either grant the Publisher an exclusive licence to publish the article or will be asked to transfer copyright of the article to the Publisher. But the confusing part is, is that the reviewer are now done with reviewing (Review completed) but the new status became apperently ''Manuscript under consideration". But what I don't understand is the difference between editorial decision started and manuscipt under consideration. All lines should be at least 0.1 mm (0.3 pt) wide. Gaastra, W. (1984), in Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. Individual participants in studies have, for example, the right to decide what happens to the (identifiable) personal data gathered, to what they have said during a study or an interview, as well as to any photograph that was taken. Please note that retraction means that the article is maintained on the platform, watermarked retracted and the explanation for the retraction is provided in a note linked to the watermarked article. When reporting a study that involved human participants, their data or biological material, authors should include a statement that confirms that the study was approved (or granted exemption) by the appropriate institutional and/or national research ethics committee (including the name of the ethics committee) and certify that the study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. How long should I wait for a response from the journal? Specifically this graph shows that the ratio of peer-reviewed vs. submitted manuscripts is floating around 13%. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by [full name], [full name] and [full name]. Once you have submitted your manuscript, it goes through our editorial process. Authors are recommended to adhere to the minimum reporting guidelines hosted by the EQUATOR Network when preparing their manuscript. Use of an LLM should be properly documented in the Methods section (and if a Methods section is not available, in a suitable alternative part) of the manuscript. YOU ARE NOW READY TO SUBMIT YOUR MANUSCRIPT 19 days ago I submittedmy manuscript to a journal under Nature publishing. This research study was conducted retrospectively from data obtained for clinical purposes. Informed consent for publication should be obtained if there is any doubt. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study., Written informed consent was obtained from the parents.. ), Humana, Totowa, NJ, pp. No funding was received for conducting this study. Authors should adhere to discipline-specific rules for acquiring, selecting and processing data. [CDATA[> manuscript under editorial consideration nature methods. When all authors have the same (or no) conflicts and/or funding it is sufficient to use one blanket statement. Special Issue "Nature Inspired Peptides in Medical Sciences" Dataset identifiers including DOIs should be expressed as full URLs. The authors have no financial or proprietary interests in any material discussed in this article. This journal encourages authors to adopt RRIDs when reporting key biological resources (antibodies, cell lines, model organisms and tools) in their manuscripts. Figures in online appendices [Supplementary Information (SI)] should, however, be numbered separately. Examples of statements to be used when ethics approval has been obtained: All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. var d=new Date(); yr=d.getFullYear();document.write(yr); institution, (department), city, (state), country, A clear indication and an active e-mail address of the corresponding author, Trial registration number and date of registration for prospectively registered trials, Trial registration number and date of registration, followed by retrospectively registered, for retrospectively registered trials. No data, text, or theories by others are presented as if they were the authors own (plagiarism). 333341. Springer Nature advocates complete and transparent reporting of biomedical and biological research and research with biological applications. quality, format, scientific novelty, language etc). But in June 2022, the journal was removed from SCI indexing, what can i do, so much of work in it with two revsions taking more than a year,what can be done, Why is a PhD essential to become a peer-reviewer. Opinion, Review, and Commentary articles) must cite appropriate and relevant literature in support of the claims made. . In the event of publication, the received date is the date of submission to the journal where the manuscript is published. the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in What is the meaning of "decision in process" status? publications - What proportion of papers submitted to Nature are In the case of an authorship dispute during peer review or after acceptance and publication, the Journal will not be in a position to investigate or adjudicate. Please describe any sources of funding that have supported the work. Manuscript Nature switched from ''Review completed'' to - Reddit If the article has already been published online, depending on the nature and severity of the infraction: - an erratum/correction may be placed with the article - an expression of concern may be placed with the article After initial checks are complete, the manuscript is assigned to an editor, who reads the paper, consults with the editorial team, and decides whether it should . Publishing in Nature Research journals: Difference between "Editorial Consent and already available data and/or biologic material. Disclosure of interests provides a complete and transparent process and helps readers form their own judgments of potential bias. Please see our guidelines for initial submission to make sure that you provide us with all necessary information at this stage. Statements should include, where applicable, hyperlinks to publicly archived datasets analysed or generated during the study. Authors should avoid untrue statements about an entity (who can be an individual person or a company) or descriptions of their behavior or actions that could potentially be seen as personal attacks or allegations about that person. For authors that are (temporarily) unaffiliated we will only capture their city and country of residence, not their e-mail address unless specifically requested. Do not number the appendix figures, "A1, A2, A3, etc." Other declarations include Ethics approval, Consent, Data, Material and/or Code availability and Authors contribution statements. Examples of such statement(s) are shown below: All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Authors should check with their institution to make sure they are complying with the specific requirements of their institution and seek ethics approval where needed. Accessed December 31, 2006. ]]> If there is suspicion of misbehavior or alleged fraud the Journal and/or Publisher will carry out an investigation following COPE guidelines. and JavaScript. If the manuscript is transferred, the original reviewer reports and identities will be shared with the receiving journal (with the exception of transfers to the npj Series and Scientific Reports). this is editorial consideration. Please note that submissions that do not include required statements will be returned as incomplete. Depending on the situation, this may result in the Journals and/or Publishers implementation of the following measures, including, but not limited to: - an erratum/correction may be placed with the article, - an expression of concern may be placed with the article. If your manuscript issent out for peer review, you will receive an email asking you to read and sign our Editorial Policies. [CDATA[// >